LG 40WP95C-W vs Monoprice Zero-G
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSMonoprice Zero-G
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNLG 40WP95C-W and Monoprice Zero-G are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Monoprice Zero-G leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5 ms vs 7.8 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Monoprice Zero-G
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | Monoprice Zero-G | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7.8 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or Monoprice Zero-G better?
LG 40WP95C-W and Monoprice Zero-G are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Monoprice Zero-G leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5 ms vs 7.8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Monoprice Zero-G leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).