LG 40WP95C-W vs Philips 34E1C5600HE
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSPhilips 34E1C5600HE
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95C-W and Philips 34E1C5600HE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 34E1C5600HE leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 34E1C5600HE leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 34E1C5600HE
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | Philips 34E1C5600HE | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | ≈ $370 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or Philips 34E1C5600HE better?
LG 40WP95C-W and Philips 34E1C5600HE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 34E1C5600HE leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: Philips 34E1C5600HE leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 34E1C5600HE leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG 40WP95C-W ≈ $1,400, Philips 34E1C5600HE ≈ $370. Current prices vary by store.