LG 40WP95C-W vs Pixio PX275h
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSPixio PX275h
27″ · 2560×1440 · 95 Hz · IPSLG 40WP95C-W and Pixio PX275h are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PX275h leads (95 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: Pixio PX275h leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Pixio PX275h
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | Pixio PX275h | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 95 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or Pixio PX275h better?
LG 40WP95C-W and Pixio PX275h are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Pixio PX275h leads (95 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: Pixio PX275h leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PX275h leads (95 Hz vs 72 Hz).