LG 40WP95C-W vs Sceptre C355W-3440UN
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSSceptre C355W-3440UN
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95C-W and Sceptre C355W-3440UN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Sceptre C355W-3440UN leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: Sceptre C355W-3440UN leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Sceptre C355W-3440UN
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | Sceptre C355W-3440UN | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 35″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or Sceptre C355W-3440UN better?
LG 40WP95C-W and Sceptre C355W-3440UN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Sceptre C355W-3440UN leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: Sceptre C355W-3440UN leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Sceptre C355W-3440UN leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).