LG 40WP95C-W vs ViewSonic XG2701
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSViewSonic XG2701
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNLG 40WP95C-W and ViewSonic XG2701 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2701 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic XG2701 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic XG2701
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | ViewSonic XG2701 | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or ViewSonic XG2701 better?
LG 40WP95C-W and ViewSonic XG2701 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2701 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic XG2701 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2701 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).