LG 40WP95CP-W vs Philips 242G5DJEB
LG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSPhilips 242G5DJEB
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNLG 40WP95CP-W and Philips 242G5DJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 242G5DJEB leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 242G5DJEB leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 242G5DJEB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95CP-W | Philips 242G5DJEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95CP-W or Philips 242G5DJEB better?
LG 40WP95CP-W and Philips 242G5DJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 242G5DJEB leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: Philips 242G5DJEB leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 242G5DJEB leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).