LG 40WP95CP-W vs Philips 27E3C2200
LG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSPhilips 27E3C2200
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VALG 40WP95CP-W and Philips 27E3C2200 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27E3C2200 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27E3C2200 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27E3C2200
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95CP-W | Philips 27E3C2200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95CP-W or Philips 27E3C2200 better?
LG 40WP95CP-W and Philips 27E3C2200 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27E3C2200 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: Philips 27E3C2200 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27E3C2200 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).