LG 40WP95CP-W vs VIOTEK GN32C
LG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSVIOTEK GN32C
32″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VALG 40WP95CP-W and VIOTEK GN32C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32C leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: VIOTEK GN32C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN32C
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95CP-W | VIOTEK GN32C | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95CP-W or VIOTEK GN32C better?
LG 40WP95CP-W and VIOTEK GN32C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32C leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: VIOTEK GN32C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32C leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).