LG 40WP95CP-W vs VIOTEK GN34CB
LG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSVIOTEK GN34CB
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95CP-W and VIOTEK GN34CB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN34CB leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: VIOTEK GN34CB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN34CB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95CP-W | VIOTEK GN34CB | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95CP-W or VIOTEK GN34CB better?
LG 40WP95CP-W and VIOTEK GN34CB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN34CB leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: VIOTEK GN34CB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN34CB leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).