LG 49WQ95C-W vs Razer Raptor 27
LG 49WQ95C-W
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · Nano IPSRazer Raptor 27
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSLG 49WQ95C-W and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 73.
- Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Razer Raptor 27 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Razer Raptor 27 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 49WQ95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Razer Raptor 27
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 49WQ95C-W | Razer Raptor 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 73 |
| 49″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| Nano IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $1,500 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 49WQ95C-W or Razer Raptor 27 better?
LG 49WQ95C-W and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 73. Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Razer Raptor 27 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Razer Raptor 27 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Razer Raptor 27 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).