LG E1942S-BN vs NEC V322-AVT
LG E1942S-BN
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzNEC V322-AVT
32″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzOn specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for NEC V322-AVT.
- Resolution: NEC V322-AVT leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
LG E1942S-BN
If you care most about response time.
NEC V322-AVT
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942S-BN | NEC V322-AVT | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 21 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1360×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942S-BN or NEC V322-AVT better?
On specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for NEC V322-AVT. Resolution: NEC V322-AVT leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).