LG E1942S-BN vs Philips BDL3210Q/00
LG E1942S-BN
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzPhilips BDL3210Q/00
31.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzOn specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00.
- Resolution: Philips BDL3210Q/00 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
LG E1942S-BN
If you care most about response time.
Philips BDL3210Q/00
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942S-BN | Philips BDL3210Q/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 21 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1360×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942S-BN or Philips BDL3210Q/00 better?
On specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00. Resolution: Philips BDL3210Q/00 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).