LG E1942S-BN vs Samsung LE32C
LG E1942S-BN
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzSamsung LE32C
32″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzOn specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Samsung LE32C.
- Resolution: Samsung LE32C leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
LG E1942S-BN
If you care most about response time.
Samsung LE32C
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942S-BN | Samsung LE32C | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 21 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1360×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942S-BN or Samsung LE32C better?
On specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Samsung LE32C. Resolution: Samsung LE32C leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).