LG E1942TC-BN vs Planar PLL1910M
LG E1942TC-BN
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzPlanar PLL1910M
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 HzLG E1942TC-BN and Planar PLL1910M are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24.
- Resolution: Planar PLL1910M leads (1280×1024 vs 1366×768).
- Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
LG E1942TC-BN
If you care most about response time.
Planar PLL1910M
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942TC-BN | Planar PLL1910M | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 24 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1280×1024 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 14 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942TC-BN or Planar PLL1910M better?
LG E1942TC-BN and Planar PLL1910M are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24. Resolution: Planar PLL1910M leads (1280×1024 vs 1366×768). Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).