Monitors / Comparison
LG E1942TC-BN vs Planar PLL1910W
Monitor · LG
LG E1942TC-BN
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Planar
Planar PLL1910W
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
Verdict
LG E1942TC-BN and Planar PLL1910W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942TC-BN | Planar PLL1910W | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 24 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942TC-BN or Planar PLL1910W better?
LG E1942TC-BN and Planar PLL1910W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24.