LG EB2742V-BN vs LG W2452T-TF
LG EB2742V-BN
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 HzLG W2452T-TF
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 HzLG EB2742V-BN and LG W2452T-TF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Resolution: LG W2452T-TF leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG EB2742V-BN leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG W2452T-TF leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
LG EB2742V-BN
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG W2452T-TF
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG EB2742V-BN | LG W2452T-TF | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG EB2742V-BN or LG W2452T-TF better?
LG EB2742V-BN and LG W2452T-TF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Resolution: LG W2452T-TF leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG EB2742V-BN leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG W2452T-TF leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG EB2742V-BN leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).