MSI G253PF vs MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
MSI G253PF
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 380 Hz · IPSMSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSMSI G253PF and MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81.
- Resolution: MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G253PF leads (380 Hz vs 160 Hz).
MSI G253PF
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G253PF | MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M | |
|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gear score | 81 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 380 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G253PF or MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M better?
MSI G253PF and MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81. Resolution: MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G253PF leads (380 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G253PF leads (380 Hz vs 160 Hz).