MSI G27C3F vs Samsung LS27R750QENXZA
MSI G27C3F
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · VASamsung LS27R750QENXZA
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAMSI G27C3F and Samsung LS27R750QENXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68.
- Resolution: Samsung LS27R750QENXZA leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G27C3F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G27C3F leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
MSI G27C3F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung LS27R750QENXZA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G27C3F | Samsung LS27R750QENXZA | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Gear score | 68 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $130 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G27C3F or Samsung LS27R750QENXZA better?
MSI G27C3F and Samsung LS27R750QENXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68. Resolution: Samsung LS27R750QENXZA leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G27C3F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI G27C3F leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G27C3F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).