MSI G27C6P E2 vs Samsung C49RG9
MSI G27C6P E2
27″ · 1920×1080 · 170 Hz · VASamsung C49RG9
49″ · 5120×1440 · 120 Hz · VAMSI G27C6P E2 and Samsung C49RG9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68.
- Resolution: Samsung C49RG9 leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
MSI G27C6P E2
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung C49RG9
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G27C6P E2 | Samsung C49RG9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 68 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,300 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G27C6P E2 or Samsung C49RG9 better?
MSI G27C6P E2 and Samsung C49RG9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68. Resolution: Samsung C49RG9 leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 120 Hz).