MSI MAG 255F E20 vs Philips Evnia 279M1RV
MSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSPhilips Evnia 279M1RV
27″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · Nano IPSMSI MAG 255F E20 and Philips Evnia 279M1RV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips Evnia 279M1RV
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 255F E20 | Philips Evnia 279M1RV | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 75 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| Rapid IPS | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $740 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 255F E20 or Philips Evnia 279M1RV better?
MSI MAG 255F E20 and Philips Evnia 279M1RV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Resolution: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).