MSI MAG 255F E20 vs VIOTEK GFI27QXA
MSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSVIOTEK GFI27QXA
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255F E20 and VIOTEK GFI27QXA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.
- Resolution: VIOTEK GFI27QXA leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
VIOTEK GFI27QXA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 255F E20 | VIOTEK GFI27QXA | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 75 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| Rapid IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 255F E20 or VIOTEK GFI27QXA better?
MSI MAG 255F E20 and VIOTEK GFI27QXA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Resolution: VIOTEK GFI27QXA leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).