MSI MAG 272F X24 vs ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q
MSI MAG 272F X24
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · Rapid IPSViewSonic ELITE XG320Q
32″ · 2560×1440 · 175 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 272F X24 and ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 78.
- Resolution: ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 272F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 272F X24 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
MSI MAG 272F X24
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 272F X24 | ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 78 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 175 Hz |
| Rapid IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 272F X24 or ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q better?
MSI MAG 272F X24 and ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 78. Resolution: ViewSonic ELITE XG320Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 272F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 272F X24 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 272F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz).