Monitors / Comparison

MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85

Monitor · MSI

MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16

26.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 86.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate68
Resolution100
Panel100
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 85.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution100
Panel66
Verdict

MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 and Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85.

  • Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85
86Gear score85
26.5″Screen size31.5″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
165 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
OLEDPanelVA

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 or Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 better?

MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 and Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85. Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).