MSI MAG 27C6F vs Philips 558M1RY/27
MSI MAG 27C6F
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · VAPhilips 558M1RY/27
55″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · VAMSI MAG 27C6F and Philips 558M1RY/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: Philips 558M1RY/27 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6F leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 27C6F leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
MSI MAG 27C6F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 558M1RY/27
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 27C6F | Philips 558M1RY/27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 55″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $130 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 27C6F or Philips 558M1RY/27 better?
MSI MAG 27C6F and Philips 558M1RY/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: Philips 558M1RY/27 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6F leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 27C6F leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6F leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).