MSI MAG 27C6PF vs VIOTEK SUW49C
MSI MAG 27C6PF
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · VAVIOTEK SUW49C
49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VAMSI MAG 27C6PF and VIOTEK SUW49C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: VIOTEK SUW49C leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
MSI MAG 27C6PF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
VIOTEK SUW49C
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 27C6PF | VIOTEK SUW49C | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 27C6PF or VIOTEK SUW49C better?
MSI MAG 27C6PF and VIOTEK SUW49C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: VIOTEK SUW49C leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).