MSI MAG 32CQ6F vs Philips 27M1N5500ZA
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAPhilips 27M1N5500ZA
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 32CQ6F and Philips 27M1N5500ZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 77.
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 32CQ6F | Philips 27M1N5500ZA | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 77 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 32CQ6F or Philips 27M1N5500ZA better?
MSI MAG 32CQ6F and Philips 27M1N5500ZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 77. Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).