MSI MPG 274URF QD vs Philips Evnia
MSI MPG 274URF QD
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia
41.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDMSI MPG 274URF QD and Philips Evnia are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83.
- Refresh rate: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (160 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
MSI MPG 274URF QD
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MPG 274URF QD | Philips Evnia | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 83 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 41.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 138 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $375 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MPG 274URF QD or Philips Evnia better?
MSI MPG 274URF QD and Philips Evnia are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83. Refresh rate: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (160 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (160 Hz vs 138 Hz).