MSI PRO MP2412C vs Philips 328E9FJAB
MSI PRO MP2412C
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VAPhilips 328E9FJAB
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAMSI PRO MP2412C and Philips 328E9FJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 53.
- Resolution: Philips 328E9FJAB leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP2412C leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
MSI PRO MP2412C
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 328E9FJAB
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI PRO MP2412C | Philips 328E9FJAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 53 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI PRO MP2412C or Philips 328E9FJAB better?
MSI PRO MP2412C and Philips 328E9FJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 53. Resolution: Philips 328E9FJAB leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP2412C leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP2412C leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).