NEC AS172-BK vs Samsung BX2035
NEC AS172-BK
17″ · 1280×1024 · 76 Hz · TNSamsung BX2035
20″ · 1600×900 · 60 Hz · TNNEC AS172-BK and Samsung BX2035 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36.
- Resolution: Samsung BX2035 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024).
- Refresh rate: NEC AS172-BK leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung BX2035 leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
NEC AS172-BK
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung BX2035
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| NEC AS172-BK | Samsung BX2035 | |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | Gear score | 36 |
| 17″ | Screen size | 20″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1600×900 |
| 76 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| ≈ $390 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is NEC AS172-BK or Samsung BX2035 better?
NEC AS172-BK and Samsung BX2035 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36. Resolution: Samsung BX2035 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024). Refresh rate: NEC AS172-BK leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung BX2035 leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: NEC AS172-BK leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz).