NEC E172M-BK vs Samsung 2333T
NEC E172M-BK
17″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TNSamsung 2333T
23″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzNEC E172M-BK and Samsung 2333T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31.
- Resolution: Samsung 2333T leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: NEC E172M-BK leads (5.5 ms vs 8 ms).
NEC E172M-BK
If you care most about response time.
Samsung 2333T
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| NEC E172M-BK | Samsung 2333T | |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | Gear score | 31 |
| 17″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5.5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $190 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is NEC E172M-BK or Samsung 2333T better?
NEC E172M-BK and Samsung 2333T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31. Resolution: Samsung 2333T leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Response time: NEC E172M-BK leads (5.5 ms vs 8 ms).