NEC EA193MI-BK vs Samsung SF351
NEC EA193MI-BK
19″ · 1280×1024 · 75 Hz · IPSSamsung SF351
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA · 2016NEC EA193MI-BK and Samsung SF351 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40.
- Resolution: Samsung SF351 leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Refresh rate: NEC EA193MI-BK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung SF351 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
NEC EA193MI-BK
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung SF351
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| NEC EA193MI-BK | Samsung SF351 | |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | Gear score | 40 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Release year | 2016 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is NEC EA193MI-BK or Samsung SF351 better?
NEC EA193MI-BK and Samsung SF351 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40. Resolution: Samsung SF351 leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Refresh rate: NEC EA193MI-BK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung SF351 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: NEC EA193MI-BK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).