Monitors / Comparison
NEC V322 vs Samsung E1920X
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung E1920X
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
Verdict
On specs, Samsung E1920X comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for NEC V322.
- Resolution: NEC V322 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: Samsung E1920X leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
NEC V322
If you care most about resolution.
Pick this
Samsung E1920X
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| NEC V322 | Samsung E1920X | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Gear score | 24 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1360×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $800 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is NEC V322 or Samsung E1920X better?
On specs, Samsung E1920X comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for NEC V322. Resolution: NEC V322 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: Samsung E1920X leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).