Philips 220B4LPCB vs Samsung C24A650X
Philips 220B4LPCB
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 HzSamsung C24A650X
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzPhilips 220B4LPCB and Samsung C24A650X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31.
- Resolution: Samsung C24A650X leads (1920×1080 vs 1680×1050).
- Response time: Philips 220B4LPCB leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 220B4LPCB
If you care most about response time.
Samsung C24A650X
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 220B4LPCB | Samsung C24A650X | |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | Gear score | 31 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1680×1050 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 220B4LPCB or Samsung C24A650X better?
Philips 220B4LPCB and Samsung C24A650X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31. Resolution: Samsung C24A650X leads (1920×1080 vs 1680×1050). Response time: Philips 220B4LPCB leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).