Philips 227E7QDSB/11 vs Samsung S24E650DW
Philips 227E7QDSB/11
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung S24E650DW
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · PLSPhilips 227E7QDSB/11 and Samsung S24E650DW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43.
- Resolution: Samsung S24E650DW leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Response time: Samsung S24E650DW leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Samsung S24E650DW
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 227E7QDSB/11 | Samsung S24E650DW | |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | Gear score | 43 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | PLS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 227E7QDSB/11 or Samsung S24E650DW better?
Philips 227E7QDSB/11 and Samsung S24E650DW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43. Resolution: Samsung S24E650DW leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Response time: Samsung S24E650DW leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).