Philips 241V8LB vs Samsung M70UA
Philips 241V8LB
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VASamsung M70UA
43″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 241V8LB and Samsung M70UA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung M70UA leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 241V8LB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 241V8LB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 241V8LB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung M70UA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 241V8LB | Samsung M70UA | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $90 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 241V8LB or Samsung M70UA better?
Philips 241V8LB and Samsung M70UA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung M70UA leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 241V8LB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 241V8LB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 241V8LB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).