Philips 271B8QTAA vs Samsung S30B
Philips 271B8QTAA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung S30B
32″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VAPhilips 271B8QTAA and Samsung S30B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43.
- Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 271B8QTAA leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 271B8QTAA
If you care most about response time.
Samsung S30B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 271B8QTAA | Samsung S30B | |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | Gear score | 43 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $280 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 271B8QTAA or Samsung S30B better?
Philips 271B8QTAA and Samsung S30B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43. Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 271B8QTAA leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).