Philips 271V8LAB vs Samsung FT872
Philips 271V8LAB
27″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VASamsung FT872
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 271V8LAB and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 271V8LAB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 271V8LAB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung FT872
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 271V8LAB | Samsung FT872 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 271V8LAB or Samsung FT872 better?
Philips 271V8LAB and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 271V8LAB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).