Philips 326E8FJSB vs Samsung FT872
Philips 326E8FJSB
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASamsung FT872
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 326E8FJSB and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 326E8FJSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 326E8FJSB leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 326E8FJSB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung FT872
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 326E8FJSB | Samsung FT872 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 326E8FJSB or Samsung FT872 better?
Philips 326E8FJSB and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 326E8FJSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 326E8FJSB leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 326E8FJSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).