Philips 349X7FJEW/27 vs Samsung FT872
Philips 349X7FJEW/27
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · VASamsung FT872
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 349X7FJEW/27 and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips 349X7FJEW/27
If you care most about response time.
Samsung FT872
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 349X7FJEW/27 | Samsung FT872 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 349X7FJEW/27 or Samsung FT872 better?
Philips 349X7FJEW/27 and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Response time: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).