Monitors / Comparison

Philips 43BDL3010Q vs Samsung CF390

Monitor · Philips

Philips 43BDL3010Q

42.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 40.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time40
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung CF390

24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 40.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Verdict

Philips 43BDL3010Q and Samsung CF390 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 40.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Philips 43BDL3010QSamsung CF390
40Gear score40
42.5″Screen size24″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelVA
6.5 msResponse time—
—Estimated price≈ $70

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Philips 43BDL3010Q or Samsung CF390 better?

Philips 43BDL3010Q and Samsung CF390 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 40.

Similar comparisons

Philips 43BDL3010Q vs ASUS VN247H-PPhilips 43BDL3010Q vs ASUS VX238HPhilips 43BDL3010Q vs ASUS VX238H-WPhilips 43BDL3010Q vs BenQ VW2420HPhilips 43BDL3010Q vs BenQ GW2455HSamsung CF390 vs ASUS VN247H-PSamsung CF390 vs ASUS VX238HSamsung CF390 vs ASUS VX238H-WSamsung CF390 vs BenQ VW2420HSamsung CF390 vs BenQ GW2455H