Monitors / Comparison

Philips ph-278C4QHSN vs Samsung SE310

Monitor · Philips

Philips ph-278C4QHSN

27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 43.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung SE310

23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 42.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time90
Verdict

Philips ph-278C4QHSN and Samsung SE310 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42.

  • Response time: Samsung SE310 leads (1 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this

Samsung SE310

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Philips ph-278C4QHSNSamsung SE310
43Gear score42
27″Screen size23.6″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelTN
7 msResponse time1 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Philips ph-278C4QHSN or Samsung SE310 better?

Philips ph-278C4QHSN and Samsung SE310 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42. Response time: Samsung SE310 leads (1 ms vs 7 ms).

Similar comparisons

Philips ph-278C4QHSN vs AOC 24B1XHPhilips ph-278C4QHSN vs AOC 24B1XHSPhilips ph-278C4QHSN vs AOC P2370SDPhilips ph-278C4QHSN vs Dell S2240LPhilips ph-278C4QHSN vs Dell S2240MSamsung SE310 vs ASUS ML239HSamsung SE310 vs ASUS MX239HSamsung SE310 vs ASUS MX279HSamsung SE310 vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung SE310 vs BenQ BL2483