Monitors / Comparison
Planar PXN2480MW vs Samsung S32E590C
Monitor · Planar
Planar PXN2480MW
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S32E590C
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict
Planar PXN2480MW and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42.
- Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S32E590C
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Planar PXN2480MW | Samsung S32E590C | |
|---|---|---|
| 43 | Gear score | 42 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 7 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $197 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Planar PXN2480MW or Samsung S32E590C better?
Planar PXN2480MW and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42. Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Similar comparisons
Planar PXN2480MW vs AOC 24B1XHPlanar PXN2480MW vs AOC 24B1XHSPlanar PXN2480MW vs AOC P2370SDPlanar PXN2480MW vs Dell S2240LPlanar PXN2480MW vs Dell S2240MSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS ML239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX279HSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2483