Monitors / Comparison

Samsung BX2035 vs Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung BX2035

20″ · 1600×900 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 36.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution36
Panel50
Response time78
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA

21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 36.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Verdict

Samsung BX2035 and Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36.

  • Resolution: Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA leads (1920×1080 vs 1600×900).
Pick this

Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung BX2035Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA
36Gear score36
20″Screen size21.5″
1600×900Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
TNPanelTN
2 msResponse time—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Samsung BX2035 or Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA better?

Samsung BX2035 and Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36. Resolution: Samsung LS22E310HS/ZA leads (1920×1080 vs 1600×900).