Monitors / Comparison

Samsung BX2035 vs ViewSonic VG939SM

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung BX2035

20″ · 1600×900 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 36.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution36
Panel50
Response time78
VS
Monitor · ViewSonic

ViewSonic VG939SM

19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 36.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution33
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict

Samsung BX2035 and ViewSonic VG939SM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36.

  • Resolution: Samsung BX2035 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024).
  • Response time: Samsung BX2035 leads (2 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this

Samsung BX2035

If you care most about resolution, response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung BX2035ViewSonic VG939SM
36Gear score36
20″Screen size19″
1600×900Resolution1280×1024
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
TNPanelIPS
2 msResponse time14 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung BX2035 or ViewSonic VG939SM better?

Samsung BX2035 and ViewSonic VG939SM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36. Resolution: Samsung BX2035 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024). Response time: Samsung BX2035 leads (2 ms vs 14 ms).

Similar comparisons

Samsung BX2035 vs MSI PRO MP221Samsung BX2035 vs ASUS VW22AT-CSMSamsung BX2035 vs BenQ BL2201PUSamsung BX2035 vs Samsung BX2350Samsung BX2035 vs Samsung T190GNViewSonic VG939SM vs MSI PRO MP221ViewSonic VG939SM vs ASUS VW22AT-CSMViewSonic VG939SM vs BenQ BL2201PUViewSonic VG939SM vs AOC VIPRB-E2280SWDN