Monitors / Comparison
Samsung BX2431 vs Samsung CF390
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung BX2431
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
VS
Verdict
Samsung BX2431 and Samsung CF390 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung BX2431 | Samsung CF390 | |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | Gear score | 40 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $70 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung BX2431 or Samsung CF390 better?
Samsung BX2431 and Samsung CF390 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40.