Monitors / Comparison
Samsung C24F390 vs Samsung SH650
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung C24F390
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SH650
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · PLSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel65
Response time50
Verdict
Samsung C24F390 and Samsung SH650 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41.
- Response time: Samsung C24F390 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Samsung C24F390
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung C24F390 | Samsung SH650 | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 41 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | PLS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $70 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung C24F390 or Samsung SH650 better?
Samsung C24F390 and Samsung SH650 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41. Response time: Samsung C24F390 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung C24F390 vs ASUS ML239HSamsung C24F390 vs ASUS MX239HSamsung C24F390 vs ASUS MX279HSamsung C24F390 vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung C24F390 vs BenQ BL2483Samsung SH650 vs ASUS MT276HESamsung SH650 vs ASUS PB238QSamsung SH650 vs ASUS VA249HESamsung SH650 vs Sony FWD48W650DSamsung SH650 vs Samsung SF351