Monitors / Comparison
Samsung CF391 vs Samsung SF351
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung CF391
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA · 2016Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Recency30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SF351
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA · 2016Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time50
Recency30
Verdict
Samsung CF391 and Samsung SF351 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40.
- Response time: Samsung CF391 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Samsung CF391
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung CF391 | Samsung SF351 | |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | Gear score | 40 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| 2016 | Release year | 2016 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung CF391 or Samsung SF351 better?
Samsung CF391 and Samsung SF351 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 41 and 40. Response time: Samsung CF391 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).