Samsung F22T452FQN vs Samsung S39C
Samsung F22T452FQN
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSSamsung S39C
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VASamsung F22T452FQN and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46.
- Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Samsung S39C
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung F22T452FQN | Samsung S39C | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 | Gear score | 46 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $192 | Estimated price | ≈ $140 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung F22T452FQN or Samsung S39C better?
Samsung F22T452FQN and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46. Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Samsung F22T452FQN ≈ $192, Samsung S39C ≈ $140. Current prices vary by store.