Monitors / Comparison
Samsung FT650 vs Samsung S39C
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung FT650
24″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S39C
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict
Samsung FT650 and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46.
- Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S39C
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung FT650 | Samsung S39C | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 | Gear score | 46 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $140 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung FT650 or Samsung S39C better?
Samsung FT650 and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46. Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung FT650 vs ASUS ASUSPRO C622AQHSamsung FT650 vs ASUS Designo MZ279HLSamsung FT650 vs ASUS PA279QSamsung FT650 vs AOC 22V2HSamsung FT650 vs AOC 24G2E5Samsung S39C vs ASUS PB298QSamsung S39C vs ASUS VG245HSamsung S39C vs MSI Pro MP272CSamsung S39C vs MSI PRO MP271CWSamsung S39C vs MSI Pro MP271C