Samsung FT872 vs Samsung T27A950
Samsung FT872
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VASamsung T27A950
27″ · 1920×1080 · 120 HzSamsung FT872 and Samsung T27A950 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Samsung T27A950 leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung T27A950 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Samsung FT872
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung T27A950
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung FT872 | Samsung T27A950 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | — |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung FT872 or Samsung T27A950 better?
Samsung FT872 and Samsung T27A950 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung FT872 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Samsung T27A950 leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung T27A950 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung T27A950 leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).